Research jokes
Streaming video over wireless sensor networks? Multiple hops? And over IEEE 802.15.4? I really wanted to scream why? Sometimes I would give the researchers the benefit of the doubt when I come across some bizarre piece of research which I don’t claim expertise in. Afterall, the researchers could be brilliant, and I’m just not on the same wavelength as they are. So it’s probably a good idea I’m not making a fool out of myself. BUT quite often there are many researchers, particularly those that just finished their degree, and then pursue a PhD straight away, have little idea whether their research are useful, if novel at all. For them, it seems to me, fundings for their research are easy to come by, because people in the UK don’t fight over each other to become researchers. Many top graduates instead prefer to work in the more lucrative financial sectors in the City. So research becomes an easy way out for graduates who couldn’t get into the industries.
Fair enough, universities may not be able to always retain the best people to do cutting edge research. That’s life. But those who stay on to do research are no muppets either. They are highly educated. So what’s gone wrong when you see a lot of mickey mouse papers being accepted in conferences? Oh come on, I’m sure many of you have come across such papers or presentations before. I’ve a friend who got his PhD from Cambridge. He gives me the impression that the more publications you have, the more impressive your CV becomes. When asked about the quality, he told me that very often people can get away with the quality of the publications provided that you have enough quantity. Because, employers often do not know enough about the research area of the PhDs, particularly when they move to work in a different field. Scandalous, especially when there are so many obscure conferences around that pretty much accept any paper as long as you submit one. This is really a waste of taxpayers money, on people who have no ambition of producing good research.
Having said that, I believe the supervisors of the PhD students are partly to blame as well. I’ve come across some supervisors who give very little guidance to the students. These students then work like headless chicken, with no good directions given by their supervisors. The results are, these students end up spending a lot of time working on something that add little value to the state-of-the-art, despite their effort. This is a shame. At least the situation is better in the UK, compare to some other parts of Europe, where students are not awarded their doctorate if their work are not up to their mark. This is good, as getting a PhD ain’t no walk in the park. In some countries, at least I’m aware of, not only did some jokers get their PhD, they are now assistant professors! There’s no way, in my mind, that these people have what it takes to become assistant professors so soon. In the UK, I don’t think they are even qualified to be a lecturer! So you can get a feel of why the work produced by the PhDs can sometimes be so bad.
In all honesty, the industries have an important role to play in shaping the research as well, for example when the industries are involved in collaboration work with the academia. But unfortunately, from what I’ve seen so far, a lot of the companies put their own agenda first when it comes to working in this kind of environment. In some European Integrated Project I’ve involved in, it feels like the partners work together by working independently. Incredible. And some companies are part of the consortium just because they are giant brands in their industries. They get a slice of the fundings yet can get away without contributing much to the project. Frustrating isn’t it? If European research wants to be on a par with those across the atlantic, think all the stakeholders above really need to get their act together!
Related blog posts:
