<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sensor Blog &#187; ZigBee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sensorblog.com/category/zigbee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sensorblog.com</link>
	<description>This blog covers everything about sensor networks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How ready is ZigBee?</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Sensor Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZigBee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZigBee modules are readily available nowadays. Assuming that they can all live up to their expectations, providing the network stack that allows wirelss sensor motes to be easily organised into a network fit for deployment, we will be seeing a host of software applications to be developed for wireless sensor networks this year. My concerns [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open source ZigBee implementation</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/12/13/open-source-zigbee-implementation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/12/13/open-source-zigbee-implementation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ZigBee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[open-ZB is an open source implementation of the IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee protocols. Apparently the website has been around for over a year, but not sure how long the implementation has been made available. It doesn&#8217;t seem like there&#8217;s a sizeable community using it, so if you are thinking of using the code, don&#8217;t expect to receive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/12/13/open-source-zigbee-implementation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless sensor that sits behind the ear</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/10/22/wireless-sensor-that-sits-behind-the-ear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/10/22/wireless-sensor-that-sits-behind-the-ear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Application area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZigBee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a short article in the October IET magazine about using a small ZigBee sensor the size of a hearing aid to collect and transmit data from the human body. I suspect that hearing-aid-size sensor, which is &#8220;inspired by the semicircular canals of the inner ear responsible for controlling motion and balance&#8221;, is probably [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/10/22/wireless-sensor-that-sits-behind-the-ear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZigBee-compliant</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/07/22/zigbee-compliant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/07/22/zigbee-compliant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZigBee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember doing a research on wireless sensor motes on offer in the market some months ago. It was incredibly difficult to find out exactly what does it mean when vendors claim that their motes are ZigBee-compliant. As usual from marketing materials, they do not tell you clearly the specs. Even datasheets mention nothing about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/07/22/zigbee-compliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
