<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sensor Blog &#187; Wireless Sensor Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sensorblog.com/category/wireless-sensor-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sensorblog.com</link>
	<description>This blog covers everything about sensor networks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Battery life for long term deployment</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/09/06/battery-life-for-long-term-deployment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/09/06/battery-life-for-long-term-deployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Sensor Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/09/06/battery-life-for-long-term-deployment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as I am aware, off-the-shelf batteries are not designed for long lifetime use, in the order of years. Yet they are being used for long term deployment in WSN. I&#8217;ve seen theoretical projections of how long low power wireless motes can last. But there still seems to be an unknown quantity on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/09/06/battery-life-for-long-term-deployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More standardisation for WSN</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/05/29/more-standardisation-for-wsn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/05/29/more-standardisation-for-wsn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Standardisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Sensor Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/05/29/more-standardisation-for-wsn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More standardisation activities, this time to set sensor net standard for process control. Having a big say on how wireless sensor networks (WSNs) can be used in a practical way at the moment, several industries from the automation and control sectors are trying to muscle in their own standards for WSNs. Notably the 30,000-member ISA [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/05/29/more-standardisation-for-wsn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New technology and hype</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/04/03/new-technology-and-hype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/04/03/new-technology-and-hype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Sensor Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/04/03/new-technology-and-hype/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#8217;t that long ago when 3G network was touted to give mobile users broadband experience on the move. Till today, even though I have 3G capabled mobile phone, I still am not experiencing the &#8220;web surfing&#8221; experience I enjoy 7-8 years ago using my desktop machine. Whereas the speed of fixed line broadband has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/04/03/new-technology-and-hype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How ready is ZigBee?</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Sensor Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZigBee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZigBee modules are readily available nowadays. Assuming that they can all live up to their expectations, providing the network stack that allows wirelss sensor motes to be easily organised into a network fit for deployment, we will be seeing a host of software applications to be developed for wireless sensor networks this year. My concerns [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2008/01/18/how-ready-is-zigbee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imagine</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/11/22/imagine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/11/22/imagine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Application area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Context awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Sensor Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fast forward a couple of years and imagine that we now have the &#8220;perfect&#8221; wireless sensors, what do we foresee them to add to our life? Consider the scenario where these sensors are dotted everywhere, can last an awful long time, hardy, reliable, with their position known (either by themselves or by somebody else), cheap [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/11/22/imagine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSN Deployment Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/11/14/wsn-deployment-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/11/14/wsn-deployment-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arctanck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wireless Sensor Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensorblog.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a prize to participate in this Wireless Sensor Network (WSN)  survey!
&#8220;1 full-service weekend in the alps including room and board, ski pass, and professional guiding for you. Powder guaranteed. In case you prefer summer (no skis) I am sure we can negotiate! Transport there and back is excluded.&#8221;
Wow, but I rather they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensorblog.com/2007/11/14/wsn-deployment-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
